Guest Given Posted March 29, 2017 Report Share Posted March 29, 2017 https://cointelegraph.com/news/rip-bitcoin-unlimited-bitcoin-cant-and-wont-fork-f2pool-owner TooHigh and filchef 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
filchef Posted March 29, 2017 Report Share Posted March 29, 2017 https://cointelegraph.com/news/rip-bitcoin-unlimited-bitcoin-cant-and-wont-fork-f2pool-owner ясно е че китайците са разумни хора и макар алчните за пари Битмайн които искаха да загърбят до сегашните си клиенти и да продават от новите си копачи пригодени да копат BU се опитаха да приложат силов подход то втория по големина пул в китай каза на форка но пасаран. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
filchef Posted March 29, 2017 Report Share Posted March 29, 2017 Обратното броене вече започна и пред противниците на SegWit има два пътя: 1) до 1 Август да започнат да поддържат SegWit или 2) до 1 Август да направят хардфорка с който толкова ни плашат. След тази дата SegWit ще се активира принудително без никакво значение какво искат пуловете: https://github.com/b... ... .mediawiki Specification All times are specified according to median past time. This BIP will be activate between midnight August 1st 2017 (epoch time 1501545600) and midnight November 15th 2017 (epoch time 1510704000) if the existing segwit deployment is not activated before epoch time 1501545600. This BIP will cease to be active when the existing segwit deployment activates. While this BIP is active, all blocks must set the nVersion header top 3 bits to 001 together with bit field (1<<1) (according to the existing segwit deployment). Blocks that do not signal as required will be rejected. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
filchef Posted March 29, 2017 Report Share Posted March 29, 2017 How user activated soft forks (UASF) work and why they might solve the blocksize debate too Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
filchef Posted March 29, 2017 Report Share Posted March 29, 2017 Става все по забавно, потребител от биткойнталк предлага своите BTU 1:1 за BTC на Roger Ver.Съобщението е подписано от адрес с 40 000 Биткойна https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1836672.0Междувременно май от Битфинекс ще предлагат да търгуваме BTC:BTU двойка още преди да се е появила такава Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TooHigh Posted March 29, 2017 Report Share Posted March 29, 2017 Тези работи са коментирани в "scaling bitcoin" темата. В момента големите риби клатят слабите ръце и са в процес на натрупване. През колко смърт е преминал Bitcoin, ние само можем да си мечтаем за такава безсмъртност. И както винаги някой губят доверие в Bitcoin и търсят бъдеще в Алтове под предлог, че ще задминат Bitcoin защото бил загубена кауза, провал и т.н. На такива колеги им пожелавам успех. filchef and metaflute 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
metaflute Posted March 30, 2017 Report Share Posted March 30, 2017 (edited) Малко гласове от Лондон Източник: Twitter Edited March 30, 2017 by metaflute filchef, stamen and TooHigh 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
filchef Posted March 30, 2017 Report Share Posted March 30, 2017 ето едно интересно мнение свързано с големите бегхолдери на БТС и отношението им към BU https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1836672.msg18283906#msg18283906 Seems like a rather safe bet, I doubt anyone will have the balls to take it up.For BTU to exist, it needs to have more proof-of-work than BTC (as if BTC's work exceeds it, it will be considered valid and the BTU will reorg away). But the only way hash power will stay mining it is if it's more economical, which would require that BTU price to be strictly greater than BTC's.So really, a BTU/BTC split has very little to do with miners but rather the economic participants. In fact, all BTC supporters need to do is sell their BTU holdings making sure to keep the BTU price <= 1 BTC. If that is done for long enough, all BTU coins will literally vanish.Meanwhile, BTC holders never face the same risk that their coins will disappear -- making the trade a lot safer. For this reason, BTU is pretty much doomed. If the split ever happens (which I strongly doubt), I'm more than happy to trade ~1000 BTU for 0.99 BTC each. В крайна сметка те ще решат кой ще яде баницата ако изобщо има хардфорк а не някакви си китайски ферми. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
filchef Posted March 30, 2017 Report Share Posted March 30, 2017 stamen 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
filchef Posted March 31, 2017 Report Share Posted March 31, 2017 stamen 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
filchef Posted March 31, 2017 Report Share Posted March 31, 2017 https://99bitcoins.com/bitcoin-fork-segwit-vs-bitcoin-unlimited-explained-simply/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
filchef Posted April 3, 2017 Report Share Posted April 3, 2017 http://www.altcointoday.com/chinese-exchange-huobi-asks-bitcoin-core-expert-address-scaling-issues/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.